<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sonoma Walgreens: Not a&#160;Survivor</title>
	<atom:link href="http://swamplot.com/sonoma-walgreens-not-a-survivor/2008-11-21/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://swamplot.com/sonoma-walgreens-not-a-survivor/2008-11-21/</link>
	<description>Houston, Texas real estate development, home buying, landscape, and design</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 15:20:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: kjb434</title>
		<link>http://swamplot.com/sonoma-walgreens-not-a-survivor/2008-11-21/#comment-12737</link>
		<dc:creator>kjb434</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 16:48:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://swamplot.com/?p=4034#comment-12737</guid>
		<description>I guess that answered my last question from the previous Sonoma Post!

Walgreen's will be gone.  I'm guessing there lease was up at the end of the year which would have been when Sonoma was schedule to start building 2's construction.

It would have been nice if Walgreens got a spot in the new building.  A pharmacy would do nice in denser developments like what is planned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess that answered my last question from the previous Sonoma Post!</p>
<p>Walgreen&#8217;s will be gone.  I&#8217;m guessing there lease was up at the end of the year which would have been when Sonoma was schedule to start building 2&#8217;s construction.</p>
<p>It would have been nice if Walgreens got a spot in the new building.  A pharmacy would do nice in denser developments like what is planned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
