Swamplot Archives by Tag:

Wednesday, July 18, 2007

Why Mortgage Closing Costs Are So High in Texas

Bankrate’s annual survey of home-mortgage closing costs shows Texas has the second-priciest mortgage closing costs of any state. How come? Title insurance and title searches. Texas has the most expensive in the country:

. . . the insurance department sets (or “promulgates”) the rates, with heavy input from the title agencies and insurance companies. Because the state establishes the rates, title companies don’t compete for consumers by offering lower prices.

How do title insurers compete in states where regulators set prices? According to a report issued in April by the Government Accountability Office, “title agents do not market to consumers, who pay for title insurance, but to those in the position to refer consumers to particular title agents, thus creating potential conflicts of interest.” The report says the industry is rife with kickbacks and undisclosed referral fees among title agents, real-estate agents and lenders.

The study showed that title insurance in Houston (the only Texas city polled for the study) averaged $1,185.06 for a $200,000 mortgage, 68 percent higher than the national average of $707.30. Title search costs averaged $305.08, 54 percent higher than the national average of $197.71.

In his blog, report author Holden Lewis adds a personal comment:

As a native of the Lone Star State, I urge my erstwhile neighbors to ask their members of the Lege why they allow the insurance department to get bulldozed by the title insurance industry. Maybe Texas could set a reasonable objective to have the fifth-most expensive title insurance in the country? That’s doable, right? I mean, Texas doesn’t have to be No. 1 in everything. Or maybe the state could force title insurers to compete in a free market — although cartels are pretty good at making a mockery of a market.

Read more about: , , , ,

Tuesday, June 19, 2007

Avoiding Capital Gains Taxes with 1031 Exchanges: How To Check Up on Your Qualified Intermediary

The 1031 Exchange industry grew enormously during the recent nationwide real-estate boom, as unwitting owners of suddenly high-priced real estate discovered that selling their properties would trigger substantial capital-gains tax bills. Real-estate owners hoping to defer capital-gains taxes when they sell their investment properties have regularly turned to firms touting their services as qualified intermediaries to help them get the benefits of the tax-free 1031 exchange.

1031 Exchange accommodators can help investors navigate the somewhat tricky process more flexibly, but the industry is largely unregulated. And now two of them have gone bankrupt or been accused of absconding with funds investors have placed with them between transactions:

Mr. McGhan and his companies allegedly misappropriated more than $95 million of customers’ proceeds to fund other business and personal activities, according to a lawsuit brought earlier this year by several aggrieved investors and now in federal court in Los Angeles.

The lawsuit alleges that Southwest was a Ponzi scheme in which Mr. McGhan allegedly took QI funds belonging to more than 130 clients, in part to finance investments in a company that manufactures silicone-breast implants.

Well, there’s another growth industry. But, says the Wall Street Journal,

a QI can do virtually anything with the funds in its possession, subject to its agreement with the taxpayer. “There isn’t any kind of prohibition in the tax code that says where those dollars can be placed,” says John King, senior vice president at a subsidiary of Fidelity National Financial Inc. in Jacksonville, Fla. that serves as a qualified intermediary.

Misappropriated investments are one thing; presumably the double whammy for investors whose funds have gone missing is that their exchanges will likely fail too, and they’ll end up having to pay a tax bill on gains they no longer have.

Some advice, then:

you must make sure your 1031 intermediary places your money in a segregated account (and “segregated” means only your money is in that account). You should also insist on a method to check on the account yourself to see that your funds stay put.

Read more about: , , , , , ,

Monday, April 16, 2007

Yes Money Down!

The end of the line for 100% financing?

HSBC, Wells Fargo, MortgageIT, and Chase have all cut back their no-money-down programs in the past few days, reports mortgage blog Lending Clarity (which clearly has a dog in this hunt).

Read more about: ,