10 Comment

  • Nobody’s going to complain about the destruction of this 1934 home on Beulah?

  • Too deep in the hood for anyone’s blood. Shares a backyard with a bona fide crack house.

  • @spoonman of course not its not in the right area.

  • Another historic/easy to renovate home destroyed and with it a community that had been coming together as one for years. This city sucks. Probably put up some stucco/hardi-plank/turreted/glue on rock monstrosity/soulless/community destroying testament to greed/short sightedness. I have never put capital at risk, never managed a heavily permitted, extensive remodel but I can tell you the numbers would have worked and people who don’t understand that need a push by government to see the light! Just look at every other city anywhere and you can see this kind of thing only occurs here. Sad.

  • Sboney, you put it perfectly … “I never put capital at risk” Well, then you have no dog in this fight and have absolutely no say so. Money talks, bullsh*t walks (and sometime whines on swamplot)

  • That house on Beulah is awful. 800 square feet of utter crap. I’ve lived in bigger apartments.

  • Pretty sure sboney was being facetious, Commonsense.

  • Spoonman: I don’t think he was being facetious. Could be wrong…

  • i got facetious…

  • Facetious. Totally facetious. Gotta be more careful in the future how I write this stuff. I have done total to the studs redo’s of a number of 1920s/1930s homes. It is not a friendly environment for that kind of project now. Much better twenty years ago. Now its a wonder anyone can make the numbers work. How did we all survive the houses built before IEC 2009, lead abatement laws, habitability inspections, and 2011 NEC.