THE 3 PEOPLE YOU MEET IN PARKING MEETINGS, PLUS A LITTLE NIGHTTIME ENTREPRENEURSHIP IN EADO How’d that first public meeting about changing the city’s off-street parking requirements go? Andrew Burleson reports: “The crowd at the meeting was overwhelmingly comprised of three types of people.
- 1. People who were mad that strangers were parking on the street in front of their homes and then walking to nearby businesses.
- 2. People who were upset that strangers were parking on the street in front of their homes and then walking to other homes or townhomes on the street.
- 3. People who were worried that the METRO light-rail on Richmond Ave. was going to create a parking shortage.
While those voices are pretty common, there was another case that I thought was much more interesting.
One person voiced concern that in his neighborhood (East Downtown) there were a large number of abandoned warehouses, and that vagrants were coming to these abandoned properties, setting up a hand-painted sign reading “Event Parking – $5″, ushering cars onto lots they don’t own and charging for it.
The Police Department refuses to take action to stop this, because it’s happening on private property
and the owner is not available
to complain or press charges – and has not filed a no-trespass order.
The neighborhood cannot get the absentee owner to respond
to the problem, or even communicate
with them, so they’re not getting any help from the public sector on the issue.” [NeoHouston; previously on Swamplot
Thanks to the efforts of a research physicist, Houston neighborhoods seeking relief from encroaching McMansions and towering townhomes may soon be able to defend themselves with weapons ordinarily popular only among high-school geeks. UH professor Mark Sterling appears to have succeeded in getting fellow members of the Planning & Development department’s Neighborhood Preservation subcommittee to walk around some tony neighborhoods wielding a device he built in his Heights garage: a plastic protractor mounted on a surveyor’s tripod.
Sterling’s voluntary neighborhood-by-neighborhood height and width restrictions are a proposed expansion of the recently revised lot-line and lot-size protection program. Residents of a street could decide they want to apply for the restrictions after holding amateur surveying block parties.
Other tools enlisted by Sterling in his grand proposal for neighborhood height and width limits: chalk, a computer and spreadsheet, and a tape measure. It’s easy:
To calculate height plane, starting 6 feet above the center of the street, residents would measure the diagonal angle from that point to the visual top of a house.
This is not necessarily the tallest point of a house, but the height of the tallest point of the majority of the roof line or, in the case of a triangular roof, the midsection of the triangle.
If residents on a block face decide they want height plane protection, they would again determine the height plane of the house that is the first to fall within the 70th percentile of all homes on the block face by measuring each houses’ height plane and adding them up, smallest to largest, in a spreadsheet.
The height plane angle that is the first to cross the 70th percentile would become the highest mark at which future homes could be built. [emphasis added]