“Wallpaper is to houses what tattoos are to people. When you get it, you think that it looks great and cannot wait to show your friends. Twenty to thirty years later, you cannot look at it without going ‘ughhh’ and shuddering to yourself.” [Old School, commenting on Houston Home Listing Photo of the Day: Kitchen Sampler]
About Swamplot
Swamplot covers real estate, home design and renovation, architecture, and the landscape of Houston, Texas. Swamplot did not flood during Allison — or Ike! Honest!
Read moreSend us a tip
-
Advertise
Subscribe to Swamplot
Links
1031 Exchanges
Home Design
Houston Blogs
Houston Media
Mortgages & Financing
Neighborhood Associations
Property Research
Real Estate News
Sustainable Development & Green Design
7 Comments
Sure, for bad wallpaper and bad tattoos the analogy holds.
I don’t think I’ve ever seen ‘good’ wallpaper
For that matter, I’ve ever seen “good” tattoos.
the difference is hardly any adult looks good 30 years later, plenty of houses still look great. I have seen (and have 1) good tattoos, I’ve seen a few cases where wallpaper was okay, but personally I will never put any up and would rip it out immediately if I bought a house with it.
Jason: Some of the nicer hotels (think “hipster” rather than “fancy” ) have pretty cool wallpaper. It’s mostly just simple stripes. I actually like it. Gives the place a nice modern look.
It is much easier and less painful to remove old wallpaper than an old tattoo. And you can have a party doing it.
Even a bad tattoo comes with a backstory. That’s at least something. Old wallpaper can’t even offer that much.